Free to check We’re not a law firm No win, no fee We email you when a claim is yours
★ LegalClaimPro · Free check ★ Am I owed? → Takes 2 mins · Approved
Data & privacy claim
Live claim · UK Certified — heading to trial (2028); Meta’s appeals refused

Facebook data claim.

The claim says Meta made using Facebook conditional on handing over your data — not just what you do on Facebook, but your activity across other apps and websites too — and made billions from it through targeted ads, without giving users fair value in return. It seeks £2.1bn for UK users. Meta denies it. Eligible people are included automatically.

Last reviewed August 2026 · information only, not legal or financial advice.

A claim we’re helping raise awareness of ↓

£2.1bn Compensation sought
46m UK Facebook users
Opt-out Included automatically
2016–2023 Period covered
Claim summary Live claim · UK
Facebook data claim
Run by Quinn Emanuel, for class representative Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen
Where UK
Status Live claim
Deadline Certified — heading to trial (2028); Meta’s appeals refused

Awareness only · official claim below

What this claim is about

Facebook is free to use — but the claim, brought by competition economist Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen on behalf of UK users, argues that people paid for it with their data. It says Meta used its dominant position to require users to hand over their personal information — not only what they did on Facebook, but their activity across other apps and websites (“off-Facebook” data) — and made billions from it through targeted advertising, without giving users fair value in return.

The Competition Appeal Tribunal certified the claim in 2024, and Meta’s attempts to appeal the certification and to strip out the “user damages” remedy have failed — so it is heading to a full trial, listed for 2028. Nothing has been decided on the facts, and Meta denies wrongdoing.

This is an opt-out claim covering more than 46 million UK Facebook users, seeking £2.1 billion. Eligible people are included automatically and pay nothing. To actually receive any money if the claim succeeds, you’ll likely need to register your details on the official site — it explains how, and how to opt out if you’d rather not take part. You don’t need a claims company, and LegalClaimPro doesn’t collect your details here. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

In plain English

How this kind of claim works

Group claims take different forms. Here’s the shape of this one, in plain terms.

Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT)
A specialist court that hears large consumer claims about companies breaking competition law.
Abuse of a dominant position
Using market power unfairly. Here, the claim is that Facebook’s dominance let it set unfair terms — taking users’ data without fair value in return.
“Off-Facebook” data
Information about what you do on other apps and websites, which the claim says Meta collected and linked to your profile.
Opt-out claim
If you’re eligible you’re included automatically — you pay nothing. To actually receive any money if the claim wins, you may need to register on the official site later.
Learn more about group claims in our resources

What the claim argues

1

Data as the price

The claim says people effectively “paid” for Facebook with their personal data, on terms they couldn’t really refuse.

2

Tracked off Facebook too

It argues Meta gathered data on users’ activity across other apps and websites, not just on Facebook itself.

3

Billions in ad revenue

It says Meta monetised that data through targeted advertising without giving users fair value in return.

These are allegations; Quinn Emanuel, for class representative Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen runs the claim, and the court has not ruled.

Who’s covered?

  • You had a Facebook account and used it in the UK at some point between 15 February 2016 and 6 October 2023
  • It covers the data Meta collected about you — both on Facebook and from your activity on other apps and websites — and used to target ads
  • It’s an opt-out claim, so eligible people are included automatically — nothing to pay; to receive any money if the claim succeeds, you may later need to register on the official site

How it’s unfolded

  • 2016–2023 The period the claim covers, for people who used Facebook in the UK.
  • February 2022 Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen files the claim at the Competition Appeal Tribunal.
  • February 2024 After an earlier revision to the economic case, the Tribunal certifies the claim to proceed.
  • 2024–2026 Meta’s attempts to appeal the certification, and to remove the “user damages” remedy, are refused.
  • October 2028 The full trial is listed to begin.

Common questions

Do I need to sign up?

You’re included automatically, as it’s an opt-out claim. But to actually receive any money if the claim succeeds, you’ll likely need to register your details on the official site — and you can opt out there too.

Am I covered?

Broadly, if you had and used a Facebook account in the UK between 15 February 2016 and 6 October 2023.

Will I definitely get money?

No — nothing is decided. The claim goes to trial in 2028 and Meta denies the allegations. Individual amounts haven’t been set; be wary of anyone promising a fixed sum.

Does it cost anything?

No. The claim is funded, so there’s nothing to pay and no fee taken from you. Any compensation would come from Meta.

Who’s running it?

The claim is brought by Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen with the law firm Quinn Emanuel. LegalClaimPro isn’t involved in running it — we’re raising awareness and we don’t collect your details here.

More questions? Read our FAQs

Raising awareness

Join the official claim

This claim is run by Quinn Emanuel, for class representative Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen. LegalClaimPro is featuring it to raise awareness — we don’t run the claim and we don’t collect your details here. To take part, register on the official claim site, where you’ll see who’s behind it and their terms before you join.

The official site opens in a new tab. Always check who runs a claim and their terms before sharing your details.